Brinskele

Edward Albert Brinskele v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20253:25-cv-05934California7,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDWARD ALBERT BRINSKELE, Case No. 25-cv-05934-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Docket No. 31, 36, 39 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Edward Brinskele proceeds pro se in this action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Clear Recon Corp. (“CRC”) arising from a home loan secured by his property at 12200 Pt. Reyes Petaluma Road, in Nicasio, California (the “Property”). Mr. Brinskele’s allegations concern the origination of the loan by Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”), the subsequent transfer of WaMu’s assets to Chase following WaMu’s entry into receivership in 2008, and Defendants’ later efforts to enforce the loan through foreclosure. Mr. Brinskele has amended his complaint several times, culminating in a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) that he filed while motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) were pending. 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.