Guzman

Thomas Michael Kiner v. F. Guzman, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20252:24-cv-02709California1,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS MICHAEL KINER, No. 2:24-cv-2709 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. GUZMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a prisoner at California State Prison, Solano (CSPS) proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on claims for damages against defendants Santoro, Guzman, Gregoire1, and Tyler for violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), 18 U.S.C. App. § 2. The parties have consented to have all matters in this action before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has filed an opposition to the motion as well as a sur-reply. As sur-replies are not permitted under Local Rule 230(l), and plaintiff did not obtain leave to file a sur-reply, the sur-reply will be stricken. I. Standard Defendants seek dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. When considering…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.