Seijas

Emmalie Seijas, on behalf of themself and others similarly situated v. The Jackson Laboratory, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20252:24-cv-03423California466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMMALIE SEIJAS, on behalf of No. 2:24-cv-03423-DJC-AC themself and others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. THE JACKSON LABORATORY, et al., Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for an extension of the deadline to file a motion for class certification and other related deadlines. (Ex Parte Appl. (ECF No. 24).) The Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s application (ECF No. 25), and they did so. (Opp’n (ECF No. 26).) The Scheduling Order in this case designates October 17, 2025, as the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for class certification. (Scheduling Order (ECF No. 20) at 4.) Plaintiff seeks to extend this deadline to April 17, 2026, and proportionally extend related deadlines. (Ex Parte Appl. at 4.) District courts have broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992). A scheduling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.