Nanak Foundation Trust Dated May 27, 2011 v. Landmark American Insurance Company, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NANAK FOUNDATION TRUST DATED Case No. 24-cv-01352-DMR
MAY 27, 2011,
8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 9 MOTION TO DISMISS v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 87
LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE
11 COMPANY, et al.,
12 Defendants.
13 Defendants Landmark American Insurance Company, Ironshore Specialty Insurance 14 Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, and Aspen Specialty Insurance Company (collectively, 15 “Defendants”) move to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 16 Procedure 41(b). [Docket No. 87 (Mot.).] Plaintiff Nanak Foundation Trust Dated May 27, 2011 17 filed an opposition (Docket No. 95 (Opp’n)), and Defendants filed a reply (Docket No. 100 (Reply)). 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court found this matter suitable for disposition 19 without oral argument and vacated the December 11, 2025 hearing. [Docket No. 102.] Having 20 considered the parties’ arguments, the relevant legal…