Staska
Monica Staska v. Walmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 MONICA STASKA, an individual, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02332-GPC-MSB
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 WALMART, INC., a Delaware [ECF No. 31] 15 Corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
17 Defendants. 18 This case concerns a slip and fall at a Walmart store. On September 15, 2025, Defendant Walmart, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Walmart”) filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”)1 56. ECF No. 31. On October 17, 2025, Plaintiff filed her response in opposition to Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 37, and Defendant replied on November 7, 2025, ECF Nos. 41, 42. The Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without a hearing under Local Rule 25
27 1 “Rule” or “Rules” refer to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless otherwise noted. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On…