Tayman

Jayvion T. Garr' Dena v. Tayman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20254:25-cv-09030California1,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAYVION T. GARR' DENA, Case No. 25-cv-09030-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

TAYMAN, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner currently incarcerated at Ironwood State Prison, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) correctional counselor Tayman. His complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. ECF No. 5. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.