The Upper Deck Company v. Pixels.com, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20253:24-cv-00923California4,406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, Case No. 24-cv-0923-BAS-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE v. TESTIMONY OF CHRISTIAN TREGILLIS

(ECF No. 77)

PIXELS.COM, LLC,

16 Defendant.

Before the Court is Defendant Pixels.com’s (“Pixels”) motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff The Upper Deck Company’s (“Upper Deck”) expert witness, Christian Tregillis. (ECF No. 77.) Upper Deck opposes. (ECF No. 100.) Pixels replies. (ECF No. 108.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); CivLR 7.1(d). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Pixels’ motion (ECF No. 77). I. BACKGROUND On March 26, 2024, Upper Deck commenced this action against Pixels. (Compl., Ex. 1 to Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1.) On May 28, 2024, Pixels removed the action to federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.