Teryaeva-Reed

JULIA TERYAEVA-REED v. PAMELA BONDI, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20254:25-cv-09887California2,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA TERYAEVA-REED, Case No. 25-cv-09887-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND; DENYING REQUEST

FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE;

PAMELA BONDI, et al., DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Defendants. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 4, 5 12 Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights action. Her complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.