Washeleski

Pawl Washeleski v. Golnesa Monazamfar, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20255:25-cv-03135California5,389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAWL WASHELESKI, Case No. 25-cv-03135-EKL

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT,

v. DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND

GOLNESA MONAZAMFAR, et al., RESOLVING PENDING MOTIONS Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 11, 12, 26, 74, 75, 105, 106, 107

12 Self-represented Plaintiff Pawl Washeleski filed this action and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”), No. 2 (“IFP Application”). The Court granted Washeleski’s IFP Application. ECF No. 104. In this Order, the Court screens the complaint and finds that it must be dismissed. This Order also resolves all pending motions in this case. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of Washeleski’s child custody matter in Santa Clara County Family Court. Compl. at 130. Washeleski alleges that Defendant Brooke Blecher – the state court judge who presided over that matter – engaged in judicial misconduct. Id. at 120, 183-255. Washeleski 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.