Washeleski
Pawl Washeleski v. City of Santa Clara, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAWL WASHELESKI, Case No. 25-cv-03918-EKL
Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT,
DENYING MOTION FOR
v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND
DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., COUNSEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 4,
12 Self-represented Plaintiff Pawl Washeleski filed this action and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”), No. 3 (“IFP Application”). The Court granted Washeleski’s IFP Application. ECF No. 40. In this Order, the Court screens the complaint and finds that it must be dismissed. This Order also resolves all pending motions in this case. I. THE COMPLAINT IS DEFICIENT Section 1915(e)(2) requires the Court to screen complaints filed by persons proceeding in forma pauperis. The Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seek…