Yang
William Sadowski v. Marvin Yang, Dr. David Clayton
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20253:25-cv-02008California5,057 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM SADOWSKI, Case No.: 25-CV-2008 TWR (BLM)
CDCR #AC-3517
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS, (2) DENYING MOTIONS
FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
AND PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE,
MARVIN YANG, DR. DAVID AND (3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
CLAYTON, WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 19 (ECF Nos. 2, 9–11, 13)
Plaintiff William Sadowski, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (see ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”)), along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See ECF No. 2 (“IFP Mot.”).) In his Complaint, Sadowski alleges Defendants Drs. Marvin Yang and David Clayton violated his rights under the federal constitution and…