Yang

William Sadowski v. Marvin Yang, Dr. David Clayton

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20253:25-cv-02008California5,057 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM SADOWSKI, Case No.: 25-CV-2008 TWR (BLM)

CDCR #AC-3517

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS, (2) DENYING MOTIONS

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

AND PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE,

MARVIN YANG, DR. DAVID AND (3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

CLAYTON, WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 19 (ECF Nos. 2, 9–11, 13)

Plaintiff William Sadowski, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (see ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”)), along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See ECF No. 2 (“IFP Mot.”).) In his Complaint, Sadowski alleges Defendants Drs. Marvin Yang and David Clayton violated his rights under the federal constitution and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.