Bisignano

Ignacio Ramirez Perez v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20253:25-cv-03086California1,719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 25-cv-3086-BLM IGNACIO RAMIREZ PEREZ,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS

FRANK BISIGNANO,

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 2]

17 The instant matter was initiated on November 10, 2025, when Plaintiff filed a complaint “for review of [the] final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.” ECF No. 1 at 1. That same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Motion”). ECF No. 2. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint and Motion, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs and finds that Plaintiff’s complaint is sufficient to survive the screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs All parties instituting any civil action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.