Bora

I. BACKGROUND

24 Petitioner states in her petition that she is challenging the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) 25 Order of Removal following a negative credible fear interview and subsequent denial of 26 the review request. ECF No. 1 at 2. The facts below are compiled from the petition, as well 27 as supporting documents included with Petitioner’s motion to stay (ECF No. 2). 28 Petitioner is a citizen of Turkiye who arrived at the United States on or about October 21, 2025, around Tecate, California. ECF No. 2 at 4, 13. She was found to be inadmissible, detained, and placed into expedited removal pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) Section 235(b)(1). Id. She claimed asylum, and a Credible Fear interview was conducted on October 28, 2025. Id. at 22-54. After the interview, the asylum officer issued a negative credible fear determination. Id. at 7-8; 53-54. On November 10, 2025, an IJ reviewed the negative credible fear determination, and affirmed the determination. Id. at 2-3. In the instant habeas petition, Petitioner brings three claims: (1) Violation of Due Process because she alleges the IJ did not let her attorney speak or…