Prokopev

Nikita Prokopev v. Christopher Larose; Gregory Archambeault; Kristi Noem; and Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20253:25-cv-03441California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NIKITA PROKOPEV, Case No.: 25-cv-3441-JES-MSB Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO CHRISTOPHER LAROSE; GREGORY

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

ARCHAMBEAULT; KRISTI NOEM;

15 and PAMELA BONDI, (2) REQUIRING A RESPONSE TO 16 Respondents. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; 18 (3) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND 20 (4) STAYING REMOVAL OF PETITIONER TO PRESERVE

JURISDICTION

22 [ECF Nos. 1, 2] 24 Before the Court is Petitioner Nikita Propokev’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Concurrently, Petitioner also filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis in which he attests he has no means to pay the $5. filing fee. ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 1 || Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.