Tsetse
Prince F. Tsetse v. Robert Neuschmid
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PRINCE F. TSETSE, Case No. 18-cv-01876-WHA
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS;
v. DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
ROBERT NEUSCHMID,
Defendant.
INTRODUCTION This is a federal habeas corpus action filed by a state prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2245. The operative petition in this action is the Second Amended Petition (“SAP”) (ECF No. 45). Petitioner’s claim of actual innocence was dismissed, and his claims of prosecutorial misconduct and that trial counsel was ineffective by not objecting to admitted evidence of three jailhouse telephone conversations between petitioner and his wife were subsequently denied (ECF No. 69). The United States Court of Appeals remanded the case to decide additional claims of ineffective assistance by trial counsel, as well as claims of insufficiency of evidence and cumulative error (ECF No. 73). Respondent filed a supplemental answer…