Weingartner

Kristin Della, et al. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20253:23-cv-04086California420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KRISTIN DELLA, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04086-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, UPON RECONSIDERATION

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 78

12 The Court previously granted Defendant’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, dkt. no 78 (“Motion to Seal”) in an order dated December 1, 2025. See dkt. no. 84. Upon reconsideration, the Motion to Seal is DENIED without prejudice. See United States v. Vittaly, No. C 04 3186 MHP, 2006 WL 3834229, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2006) (“A district court . . . has the power to reconsider sua sponte its orders prior to the entry of judgment.”). With respect to the documents Defendant seeks to file in redacted form (the Declaration of Ronald T. Wilcox, Ph.D., the Declaration of Ran Kivetz, Ph.D., and its Opposition brief), Defendant did not supply “a proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.