DBEST PRODUCTS, INC. v. HUNANSANTANG INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMPANY, LTD.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20252:25-cv-04625California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DBEST PRODUCTS, INC., ) Case No. CV 25-4625 FMO (PDx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE HUNANSANTANG INTERNATIONAL )

TRADE COMPANY, LTD., )

) Defendant. ) ) Plaintiff filed this action on May 21, 2025. (See Dkt. 1, Complaint). By Order dated August 8, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, on or before August 15, 2025, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See Dkt. 16, Court’s Order of August 8, 2025). Plaintiff filed a Response to the OSC on August 15, 2025, requesting an additional 30 days to either accomplish service on defendant or move under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f) for service by other means. (See Dkt. 17, Response). On October 23, 2025, more than 60 days after plaintiff requested the 30-day extension of time to effect service, the court issued a subsequent order giving plaintiff one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.