Cecil Dale Ray v. General Motors LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20252:25-cv-07358California6,543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL DALE RAY, Case No. 2:25-cv-07358-MAA

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 14)

14 GENERAL MOTORS LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION On March 27, 2025, Plaintiff Cecil Dale Ray (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court (“Superior Court”) against Defendant General Motors LLC (“Defendant”) and ten Doe Defendants. (Compl., ECF No. 1-1.) On August 8, 2025, Defendant removed the case to this Court (“Notice of Removal” or “NOR”). (NOR, ECF No. 1.) On August 12, 2025, the parties were notified of their deadline for declining consent to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 5.) No party declined consent. (See ECF No. 6.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (“Motion”), filed on August 29, 2025. (Mot., ECF No. 14.) In support of the Motion, Plaintiff filed the Declaration of Michelle Yang (“First Yang Declaration”). (Yang Decl., ECF No. 14-1.) Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.