Adrianne Bell v. DCFS Wateridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20252:25-cv-08473California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIANNE BELL, No. 2:25-cv-08473-AB-AJR Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DCFS WATERIDGE, DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION Defendant.

17 18 I. INTRODUCTION On September 4, 2025, pro se Plaintiff Adrianne Bell (“Plaintiff”) filed a “Verified Petition for Writ of Scire Facias to Vacate Void Judgment Under FRCP 60(d)(1), FRCP 60(d)(3), and 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (All Writs Act)” against DCFS Wateridge (the “Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) The Petition is difficult to understand and includes eighty-seven pages of attachments with unclear relevance. (Id.) However, Plaintiff appears to be requesting that the Court vacate a judgment entered by the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Case No. 23CCJP04256D. (Id. at 33-88.) Plaintiff asserts that judgments entered without jurisdiction or by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.