Soucek

Yaniv De Ridder, et al. v. Roblox Corporation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20253:23-cv-04146California3,712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YANIV DE RIDDER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04146-VC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. SAID’S MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ UCL AND COMMON

ROBLOX CORPORATION, et al., LAW CLAIMS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 246

The California Penal Code contains several provisions that prohibit operating a game of chance in which the player can win or lose a “thing of value.” These provisions were drafted a long time ago, and they are very difficult to understand. The question presented here is whether a website that enables people to gamble away their Robux—the virtual currency that kids spend to play games on the Roblox platform—is operating games of chance in which players can win or lose a thing of value. The answer is yes. Although the meaning of “thing of value” under the relevant provisions is more difficult to discern than it should be, Robux must be considered things of value because they are akin to arcade tokens. Roblox users spend money to purchase Robux, which, like tokens, can be used to acquire a desired product: gameplay. If you’re playing a game in an arcade and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.