Tyson James Aucoin v. B. Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20252:25-cv-06678California1,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 TYSON JAMES AUCOIN, Case No. 2:25-cv-06678-KK-JC 12 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. 14 B. BIRKHOLZ, 16 Respondent. 17 I. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY On July 16, 2025, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition) with a supporting Memorandum (“Petition Memo”), asserting that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has failed correctly to calculate Petitioner’s federal time credits earned under the First Step Act of 2018. (Docket Nos. 1, 2). The Petition and Petition Memo reflect that Petitioner’s Registration No. is 64058-510, and that he was then housed at FCI Lompoc I, 3600 Guard Road, Lompoc, CA 93436 (“Address of Record”). On July 30, 2025, the matter was assigned to this Court and referred to a United States Magistrate Judge (see Notice of Judge Assignment and Reference to a United States Magistrate Judge (“Notice”) (Docket No. 3)) who, on the same date, issued (1) an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.