Cupp

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 RONALD CUPP, Case No. 25-cy-07479-TSH Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TA FINTECH, INC., Defendant. 10 On November 17, 2025, the Court vacated the hearing on Plaintiff Ronald Cupp’s pending || motion for default judgment and directed him to file a supplemental declaration by December 1, || 2025. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has failed to respond. S The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte if a plaintiff fails to || prosecute their action or fails to comply with court orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962) (dismissal for failure to prosecute); Yourish v. Cal. 17. || Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 1999) (dismissal for failure to comply with court orders). 1g || Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed 19 || for failure to prosecute and failure…