SHAHROOZ BIGONAH v. TARGET N. HOLLYWOOD, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20252:25-cv-11399California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-11399-MRA-KES Date: December 8, 2025

Title: SHAHROOZ BIGONAH v. TARGET N. HOLLYWOOD, et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Regarding Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction

In July 2025, Plaintiff Shahrooz Bigonah (“Plaintiff”) filed a lawsuit, Los Angeles County Superior Court (“LASC”) case no. 25VECV04044, against the Target Corporation erroneously named as “Target N Hollywood” (“Target”) per the caption of the Complaint. (Dkt. 1-1 at 24.) The body of the Complaint says Plaintiff is also suing “the City of LOS ANGELES, including [Los Angeles Police Department] LAPD officers and Target employees identified as DOES.” (Id. at 25.) Target removed the case to federal district court in November 2025. (Dkt. 1.) As the sole basis for removal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.