Nguyen Hull Son v. Pam Bondi, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20255:25-cv-02107California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION NGUYEN HULL SON, ) No. 5:25-cv-02107-SVW-JDE ) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AS ) v. ) MOOT ) ) PAM BONDI, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) 17 On August 11, 2025, Nguyen Hull Son (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his continued detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). Dkt. 1. The operative First Amended Petition was filed on September 19, 2025. Dkt. 9 (“FAP”). Petitioner avers his continued detention by ICE violates the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), as, he claims, he has been detained longer than six months and “there is no significant likelihood that [he] will be removed in the foreseeable future.” FAP at 4-7. Following briefing, on December 5, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.