Magnolia Pearl, LLC v. Honey Manchanda, Khushi Manchanda, Pankaj Manchanda, Riya Manchanda, and Does 1-10

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20258:25-cv-01565California1,115 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

JS-6

2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 MAGNOLIA PEARL, LLC, a Texas) CASE NO.: 8:25-cv-01565-DOC-DFM 9 || limited liability company, 10 Plaintiff, PROPOSED} CONSENT

JUDGMENT

11 v. 12 | HONEY MANCHANDA, an individual; KHUSHI MANCHANDA, an individual; 13 || PANKAJ MANCHANDA, an individual; RIYA MANCHANDA, an individual; and 14 || DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 =PROPOSEDTGONSENT JUDGMENT 19 This Matter is before the Court on the joint motion of Plaintiff Magnolia Pearl, 20 || LLC (“Magnolia Pearl” or “Plaintiff’) and Defendant Honey Manchanda. 21 WHEREAS, this Consent Judgment as to Honey Manchanda concerns the 22 ||claims between Magnolia Pearl and Honey Manchanda in this Civil Action No. 23 || 8:25-cv-01565-DOC-DFM (the “Litigation’). 24 WHEREAS, Defendant Honey Manchanda represents to the Court that 25 ||Defendants Khushi Manchanda, Pankaj Manchanda, and Riya Manchanda were not 26 || involved in the conduct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.