Romula Cortez v. County of Orange, a California Public entity; City of San Clemente, a California Public entity

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20258:25-cv-01552California4,845 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 S. FRANK HARRELL – SBN 133437 sharrell@lynberg.com 2 G. CRAIG SMITH – SBN 265676 csmith@lynberg.com

GARROS CHAN – SBN 320561

3 gchan@lynberg.com

LYNBERG & WATKINS

4 A Professional Corporation 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1450 5 Orange, California 92868 (714) 937-1010 Telephone (714) 937-1003 Facsimile 6

Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF ORANGE 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ROMULA CORTEZ, an individual; Case No. 8:25-cv-01552-FWS(ADS) 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 COUNTY OF ORANGE, a California 14 Public entity; City of San Clemente, a California public entity; and DOES 1-20 15 inclusive

16 Defendant(s).

17 Defendant COUNTY OF ORANGE (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff ROMULA 18 CORTEZ (“Plaintiff”), by and through their attorneys of record hereby stipulate, as 19 follows: 20 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 A. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.