Rodric P. Stanley, Jr. v. Sgt Holland, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20253:24-cv-06493California2,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 RODRIC P. STANLEY, JR., Case No. 24-cv-06493-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 6 Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 21, 22 SGT HOLLAND, et al., Defendants.

9 Plaintiff, a former detainee and current prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint or in the alternative, to enforce a prior global settlement agreement. Dkt. No. 15. Plaintiff filed an opposition (Dkt. No. 17), defendants filed a reply (Dkt. No. 18), and plaintiff filed a sur-reply (Dkt. No. 19).1 Defendants’ motion is granted. BACKGROUND On August 15, 2024, plaintiff, represented by counsel in a separate case before the Court, entered into a global settlement of multiple civil rights actions against Contra Costa County and its employees. Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), Ex. A. The agreement did not specifically identify this case because the case was filed after the agreement was signed. However, as part of the settlement,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.