Cecil Elmore Jr v. Starbucks Coffee Company; Starbucks Corporation; Doe 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

11 CECIL ELMORE Jr, Case No. 2:24-cv-10259 FLA Plaintiff, (BFMx) v. Consolidated with Case No. 2:25- STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY; cv-00768 FLA (BFMx)

STARBUCKS CORPORATION;

DOE PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant.

17 1. GENERAL 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as…