Francisco Longoria v. Kristi Noem et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20255:25-cv-03098California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-03098-ODW-DFM Date: December 9, 2025 Title Francisco Longoria v. Kristi Noem et al.

Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) for Petitioner(s): Attorney(s) for Respondent(s): Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

On November 18, 2025, Petitioner Francisco Longoria filed a counseled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the grounds that his detention violates 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), Department of Homeland Security and Executive Office for Immigration Review bond regulations, the Administrative Procedure Act, and his Fifth Amendment Due Process rights. See Dkt. 1 (“‘Pet.”) at {9 53-66. Petitioner requests that the Court “[i]ssue a Writ of Habeas Corpus requiring Respondents to release Petitioner or provide Petitioner with a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven days.” Id. at 21. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.