Firsov

Sergey Firsov v. United Airlines, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20255:25-cv-03784California740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SERGEY FIRSOV, Case No. 5:25-cv-03784-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. DISQUALIFICATION

UNITED AIRLINES, INC, et al., [Re: ECF No. 94] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Sergey Firsov’s motion to disqualify the undersigned. ECF No. 94 (“Mot.”). The matter is suitable for adjudication without a hearing, and no response by Defendants is required. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On December 1, 2025, the Court denied Mr. Firsov’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions. ECF No. 89. The Court also determined that sanctions against Mr. Firsov were necessary to deter his pattern of bad-faith, vexatious conduct in these proceedings, ordering Defendants to file by December 8, 2025, a brief and declaration addressing the reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees incurred in opposing the motion for sanctions. Id. at 3. In its order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.