Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Certified Forensic Loan Auditors, LLC et al.

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California

10

11 BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL Case № 2:19-cv-07722-ODW (JEMx)

PROTECTION,

12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 INTERVENE AND REOPEN [98] v. 14

CERTIFIED FORENSIC LOAN

15 AUDITORS, LLC et al.,

16 Defendants. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On June 24, 2025, nearly five years after the Court entered Final Judgment in 20 this case, nonparties Mark Burke and his mother, Joanna Burke (the “Burkes”), 21 proceeding pro se, move to reopen the case and intervene as a matter of right under 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 24(a). (Mot. Intervene & Reopen (“Motion” 23 or “Mot”) 1, Dkt. No. 98; see Final J. ¶¶ 10–30, Dkt. No. 93.) For the reasons 24 discussed below, the Court DENIES the Burkes’ Motion.1 25 26 27

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. 1 …