Britta E. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:25-cv-00233California4,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

11 Case No. 2:25-cv-00233-BFM

BRITTA E.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, AND ORDER v.

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,2 16 Defendant.

18 This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge denying Plaintiff’s applications for Social Security benefits. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s request for remand (ECF 11) is granted and the decision of the Commissioner is reversed. 23 24 In the interest of privacy, this Report and Recommendation uses only the first name and middle and last initials of the non-governmental party in this case.

2 Frank Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security in May 2025 and is substituted as Defendant here pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal 28 Rules of Civil Procedure. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In February 2020, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.