Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Saint-Gobain North America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:25-cv-03942California212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-03942-SK Date: December 10, 2025 Title Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Saint-Gobain North America

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

For the reason indicated below, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on or before December 23, 2025 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). Defendants did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.