Jose Palomino v. General Motors, LLC et al
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
facts are adequately pled in Defendant’s Notice of Removal.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 30, 2021, Plaintiff purchased a 2021 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (the “Vehicle”) manufactured by Defendant. (Complaint (Docket No. 1-1) ¶¶ 6, 9). In connection with the purchase, Plaintiff received various warranties. (Id. ¶ 11). Following the purchase, Plaintiff alleges that defects manifested in the Vehicle, including “fuel system defects.” (Id. ¶ 12). Plaintiff presented the Vehicle to Defendant and/or its authorized service and repair facilities for diagnosis and repair of ______________________________________________________________________________
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 25-8888-MWF (AGRx) Date: December 10, 2025 Title: Jose Palomino v. General Motors, LLC et al the defects, but Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to service or repair the Vehicle in conformance with the express warranties provided to Plaintiff. (Id. ¶¶ 13–14). Based on the above allegations, Plaintiff alleges violations of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”), Cal. Civ. Code Sections 1793.2, 1791.1, and violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act…