Dustin Wade Ruffino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20252:25-cv-10592California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

19 On May 7, 2025, Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for 20 Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition) in the United States 21 District Court for the District of Utah (“Utah District”), asserting that the Bureau of 22 Prisons (“BOP”) has failed to provide him with all sentencing credit to which he is 23 entitled. (Docket No. 1). At the time Petitioner filed the Petition, he was housed at 24 FCI Victorville, P.O. Box 3725, Adelanto, California 92301 (“Address of Record”). 25 On October 31, 2025, the Utah District transferred the case to the Central 26 District of California, and it was subsequently assigned to this Court and referred to 27 a United States Magistrate Judge. (See Docket Nos. 3 [Transfer Order], 7 [Notice 28 of Judge Assignment and Reference to a United States Magistrate Judge (“Notice”)]). On November 10, 2025, the Magistrate Judge issued (1) an Order Requiring Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Case Management Order”); and (2) an Order Regarding Requirements for Preparation and Submission of Documents (collectively “November Orders”). (Docket Nos. 5-6). The Clerk sent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.