Senaida Macias Peña v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20251:25-cv-01294California767 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SENAIDA MACIAS PEÑA, Case No. 1:25-cv-01294-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

v. JUDGE

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SECURITY, RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED Defendant. IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED 16 (Docs. 2, 4)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 On October 1, 2025, Plaintiff Senaida Macias Pena (“Plaintiff”), filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). On October 2, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a long form application to proceed in forma pauperis on the basis that Plaintiff’s application was insufficient for the Court to determine if Plaintiff is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.