Vivian J. Toliver v. Clear Recon Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20252:24-cv-02139California290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIVIAN J. TOLIVER, No. 2:24-cv-2139-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER CLEAR RECON CORP., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was referred to the magistrate judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 3, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 11. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.