Costello

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWONE STOKES, No. 2:24-cv-2413 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. COSTELLO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On August 20, 2025, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, alleging plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this action. On September 11, 2025, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to oppose the motion. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On March 21, 2025 (ECF No. 19 at 9) and August 20, 2025 (ECF No. 25-1), plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion…