Haddad

Dominique Zafir Casey v. Haddad, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20251:21-cv-00855California770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND

v. SCHEDULING ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

HADDAD, et al., (Doc. 72)

Defendants. ORDER VACATING DISPOSITIVE MOTION FILING DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s constitutional claims against Defendants Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad. I. BACKGROUND The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on September 18, 2024. (Doc. 60.) On February 13, 2025, Defendants filed a Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. (Doc. 62.) The following day, the Court extended the deadlines for the completion of discovery and the filing of dispositive motions. (Doc. 63.) On March 20, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.