Pearlie Marie Breazell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20251:24-cv-01592California2,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 PEARLIE MARIE BREAZELL, Case No. 1:24-cv-01592-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THE

v. DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY BE REVERSED AND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

THIS CASE BE REMANDED FOR

Defendant. FURTHER PROCEEDINGS (ECF Nos. 1, 14). FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her application for supplemental security income benefits. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (providing for issuance of proposed findings of fact and recommendations); Local Rule 302(c)(15) (referring final social security decisions for findings and recommendations). Plaintiff argues as follows: Substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s RFC assessment. 26 The ALJ failed to properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.