Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20251:25-cv-01026California832 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BRUCE ANTHONY Case No.: 1:25-cv-01026-KES-SKO McPHERSON, 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Plaintiff, DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS PREMATURE v. 14 (Doc. 12)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

15 CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD et al., 16 Defendants. 17

18 Plaintiff Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action. 20

I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND

21 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on August 15, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On 22 August 19, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 7.) 23 On September 29, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 12.) 24

II. DISCUSSION

25 Plaintiff’s motion is premature. First, the Court has not yet screened Plaintiff’s complaint. 26 Screening of a prisoner complaint is required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). This Court is one of the 27 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.