Saterfield

Elieser Felix, Jr. v. D. Saterfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20251:25-cv-01084California5,290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIESER FELIX, JR., Case No. 1:25-cv-01084-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE (1) TO STATE A CLAIM AND

D. SATERFIELD, (2) TO PROSECUTE AND TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS AND LOCAL RULES

Defendant. (Docs. 1, 7) 16 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 17 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 18 Plaintiff Elieser Felix, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on August 27, 2025. (Doc. 1). On September 18, 2025, the Court entered the first screening order on Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 7). Because the Court found the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims against Defendants D. Saterfield and the unknown correctional officer Defendant, and that Plaintiff may be able to 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.