Lujan

Ravon Lovowe Ramsey v. Z. Lujan, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20252:24-cv-03682California2,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAVON LOVOWE RAMSEY, No. 2:24-cv-3682 CSK P Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

Z. LUJAN, et al.,

RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendants’ fully briefed motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is before the Court. (ECF No. 19) For the reasons stated below, the Court recommends that defendants’ motion be denied. I. THREE STRIKES RULE The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) permits a federal court to authorize the commencement and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit demonstrating that the person is unable to pay such fees. However, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) states: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.