Mimmick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEVI DALE LASTER, JR., No. 2:25-cv-1134 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

RONNIE MIMMICK, et al,, Defendants. 16 By order filed September 3, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the Court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic alternatives.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation omitted). Because this case cannot move forward without plaintiff’s…