Lucio Justo Ramos Carrillo v. San Joaquin County Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20252:25-cv-01927California371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIO JUSTO RAMOS CARRILLO, No. 2:25-cv-1927 CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF, Respondent. 16 By order filed September 5, 2025, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the Court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic alternatives.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation omitted). Because this case cannot move forward without petitioner’s participation, the Court finds the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.