Proudy

Ronald G. Ollivier v. Douglas Proudy, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20252:25-cv-02028California617 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD G. OLLIVIER, No. 2:25-cv-02028 DC SCR P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION DOUGLAS PROUDY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who was formerly incarcerated in county jail, is proceeding pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis on July 21, 2025. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The complaint appears to challenge actions of the Superior Court Judge, District Attorney, Deputy District Attorney, and Public Defender during plaintiff’s state criminal proceedings. (See ECF No. 1 at 3.) On August 4, 2025, the undersigned notified plaintiff that his in forma pauperis application was incomplete and granted him thirty days to file a completed application. (ECF No. 4.) After plaintiff did not resubmit an in forma pauperis application,1 the undersigned issued an order to show cause on September 10, 2025. (ECF No. 10.) The order advised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.