Gonzalez-Vazquez
Eddie L. Young v. E. Gonzalez-Vazquez, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDDIE L. YOUNG, Case No. 2:25-cv-2747-TLN-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS E. GONZALEZ-VAZQUEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. However, plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Young v. Ehler, Case No. 2:24-cv-0361-DJC-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024) (recognizing plaintiff as a “three-striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). The following cases constitute some of plaintiff’s strikes: 1. Young v. McCargar, No. 2:00-cv-2393-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal.) (complaint dismissed on August 13, 2002, for failure to state a claim); 2. Young v. Bowen, No. 2:01-cv-6368-DSF-MLG (C.D. Cal.) (second amended complaint dismissed on July 12, 2007, for failure to state a claim); and 3. Young v. Edwards, No. 2:02-cv-2289-AS-MLG (C.D. Cal.) (complaint dismissed on May 1, 2002, for failure…