Schuyler
Jesse Stephen King v. James Hill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEP 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JESSE STEPHEN KING, No. 25-5104
FILED
Applicant, Sep 22, 2025
ORDER
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES HILL,
2:23-cv-2360 KJM SCR (HC) Respondent. Before: SILVERMAN, OWENS, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition raises claims challenging the applicant’s criminal judgment and the California Board of Parole Hearings’ (“Board”) decision to deny him parole. Insofar as the applicant challenges his conviction and sentence, the application is denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if…