Schuyler

Jesse Stephen King v. James Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20252:23-cv-02360California467 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEP 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

JESSE STEPHEN KING, No. 25-5104

FILED

Applicant, Sep 22, 2025

ORDER

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HILL,

2:23-cv-2360 KJM SCR (HC) Respondent. Before: SILVERMAN, OWENS, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition raises claims challenging the applicant’s criminal judgment and the California Board of Parole Hearings’ (“Board”) decision to deny him parole. Insofar as the applicant challenges his conviction and sentence, the application is denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.