(PC)Sutton
Donte Sutton v. Altamirano, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONTE SUTTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01633-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
13 v. DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
14 ALTAMIRANO, et al., (ECF No. 32)
15 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff Donte Sutton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is 20 Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 21 and 41(b); or, in the alternative, to compel Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s discovery requests 22 and order Defendant’s Request for Admissions deemed submitted. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff did 23 not file a response or otherwise oppose Defendant’s motion, and the deadline to do so has now 24 expired. The motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l). 25 II. Relevant…