(PC)Sutton

Donte Sutton v. Altamirano, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20251:23-cv-01633California3,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONTE SUTTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01633-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

ALTAMIRANO, et al., (ECF No. 32)

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 I. Introduction Plaintiff Donte Sutton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 and 41(b); or, in the alternative, to compel Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s discovery requests and order Defendant’s Request for Admissions deemed submitted. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff did not file a response or otherwise oppose Defendant’s motion, and the deadline to do so has now expired. The motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l). II. Relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.