Trate

Travis S. Sulton v. B. M. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20251:23-cv-00709California951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS S. SULTON, No. 1:23-cv-00709-CDB (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO STAY

v. (Doc. 9) B. M. TRATE, 30-Day Deadline Respondent. 16 Petitioner Travis S. Sulton (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on May 8, 2023, while in custody of the Bureau of Prisons at the United States Penitentiary, Atwater. (Doc. 1). Petitioner argues he was denied approximately 270 days of earned time credit that should have been applied to shorten his period of supervised release. (See generally Doc. 1). After review of the petition and finding it does not plainly appear that Petitioner is not entitled to relief, on August 20, 2025, the Court ordered Respondent to respond to the petition within 60 days. (Doc. 5). On the deadline to file a response (October 20, 2025),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.