Trate

Travis S. Sulton v. B. M. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20251:23-cv-00709California951 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRAVIS S. SULTON, No. 1:23-cv-00709-CDB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO STAY

13 v. (Doc. 9) 14 B. M. TRATE, 30-Day Deadline 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Travis S. Sulton (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner 19 filed the instant habeas petition on May 8, 2023, while in custody of the Bureau of Prisons at the 20 United States Penitentiary, Atwater. (Doc. 1). Petitioner argues he was denied approximately 21 270 days of earned time credit that should have been applied to shorten his period of supervised 22 release. (See generally Doc. 1). 23 After review of the petition and finding it does not plainly appear that Petitioner is not 24 entitled to relief, on August 20, 2025, the Court ordered Respondent to respond to the petition 25 within 60 days. (Doc. 5). 26 On the deadline to file a response (October 20, 2025),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.